Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Columbia Missourian results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 317 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (3,146 of 6,628 authors). This Columbia Missourian is worse (more manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Columbia Missourian
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
53%Columbia Missourian (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,176
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

53% percentile
025507510052.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 7.5%7.5%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 3.9%3.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 0.6%0.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Middle Ground: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos