STLPR0%

UM Curators looking at 4% tuition increase for undergraduates on system campuses 9%

By Columbia Missourian0%

5/21/2026, 7:54:31 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 293 faulty-reasoning hits from 294 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26.1% and a BS Rank of 9% (19,917 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 91.00% of the article peer group.

The University of Missouri System Board of Curators is being asked to approve a 4% tuition increase for undergraduates beginning this fall on all four system campuses. 
The board will meet Thursday to consider the recommendations for fall 2026 tuition and fees. 
The average increase per semester for MU students would be $286.70, and the increase for students on other campuses would depend on inflationary pressures and the individual market. 
For students attending the University of Missouri-St. 
Louis, it would be $315 per semester. 
It would be $247.50 at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, and at the Missouri University of Science and Technology, it would be $287. 
For resident students taking 15 hours, that breaks down to a $19.11 per credit hour increase at MU, $19.13 at Missouri S&T, $16.50 at UMKC and $21 at UMSL. 
The increases compare to a range of 2%-to-4.5% increases at surrounding state and SEC public institutions, according to a presentation prepared for Thursday's meeting. 
A 3% tuition increase for graduate students is recommended, ranging from $16 to $29 per credit hour depending on the campus and the program. 
The cost for those earning professional degrees ranges from 0.8% to 4.75%, except for optometry, which remains unchanged. 
Dollar increases range from $8 to $87 per credit hour based on the degree cost and program market. 
Tuition increases would also rise by 4% for undergraduate nonresidents on all four UM campuses and 3% for graduate nonresidents. 
Increases for graduate nonresidents range from $32 to $57 per credit hour, depending on university and program. 
Fees are recommended to increase between $14 and $34 per semester across all universities. 
These fees support recreation centers, student health, unions and other services. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.2%Columbia Missourian: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias9.2%This article: 21.8%Columbia Missourian: 7.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias21.8%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 7.8%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic7.8%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 15.6%Columbia Missourian: 3.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias15.6%This article: 19.0%Columbia Missourian: 4.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect19.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect3.7%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.2%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority8.2%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion3.7%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.4%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.2%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground8.2%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

294 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker13%attributed speech255writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
University of Missouri System Board of Curators • 12 words • 0.0% coverageUniversity of Missouri System Board of Curators • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words100% of attributed speech65% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.