Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,025 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CLAIRE RUSH results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Anchoring Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 544 hits . Analysis detected 2,030 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (4,292 of 6,359 authors). This CLAIRE RUSH is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group. CLAIRE RUSH
Author details
Total words: 4,100
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.3% 13.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Composition/Division: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.4% Red Herring: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst