Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Christopher Jacobs results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 297 hits. Analysis detected 1,407 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Christopher Jacobs is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Christopher Jacobs
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Christopher Jacobs (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,628
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 18.2%18.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.3%13.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 7.8%7.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.1%9.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 2.1%2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.6%1.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 8.6%8.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 18.2%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Straw Man: Author 7.8%, sitewide 0.9%In-Group Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos