Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Christian Ruth results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 766 hits. Analysis detected 6,610 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,605 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Christian Ruth is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Christian Ruth
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Christian Ruth (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 7,605
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos