Author summary
78%1 analyzed article/video2,523 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chloe Hoyle results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Indoctrination, and False Dilemma, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 884 hits. Analysis detected 7,172 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,569 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,380 of 6,365 authors). This Chloe Hoyle is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Chloe Hoyle
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
47%Chloe Hoyle (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,569
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

47% percentile
025507510046.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.9%1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 7.1%7.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.0%4.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Author 9.5%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 7.1%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos