Author summary
78% 1 analyzed article/video 2,523 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chloe Hoyle results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Indoctrination , and False Dilemma , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 884 hits . Analysis detected 7,172 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,569 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,380 of 6,365 authors). This Chloe Hoyle is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group. Chloe Hoyle
Author details
Total words: 7,569
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.9% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.1% 7.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.5%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 7.1%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst