Author summary
23% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,987 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chloe Greenberg results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 420 hits . Analysis detected 1,989 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,722 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 15% (7,686 of 9,024 authors). This Chloe Greenberg is better (less manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group. Chloe Greenberg
Author details
Total words: 6,722
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.8% percentile 1.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.4% Composition/Division: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst