Author summary
22% 1 analyzed article/video 389 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charley DiAdamo results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Halo Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 99 hits . Analysis detected 475 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,556 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 49% (4,635 of 8,991 authors). This Charley DiAdamo is better (less manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group. Charley DiAdamo
Author details
Total words: 1,556
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst