Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video921 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CATHY BUSSEWITZ Associated Press results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 325 hits. Analysis detected 2,053 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,684 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,523 of 6,382 authors). This CATHY BUSSEWITZ Associated Press is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
CATHY BUSSEWITZ Associated Press
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
45%CATHY BUSSEWITZ Associated Press (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,684
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

45% percentile
025507510044.8% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.0%5.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 6.0%6.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.8%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%No True Scotsman: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.5%Composition/Division: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos