ABC News22%

Global oil demand is dropping 24%

By ABC News15% CATHY BUSSEWITZ Associated Press0%

7/10/2026, 9:13:42 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Availability Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 35.3% saturation with 325 hits. Analysis detected 1,538 faulty-reasoning hits from 921 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.7% and a BS Rank of 24% (16,705 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 76.30% of the article peer group.

Global oil demand is dropping, but US drivers keep buying more gas 
Global oil demand is set to decline this year for the first time since 2020 
By CATHY BUSSEWITZ Associated Press 
July 10, 2026, 5:13 PM 
NEW YORK -- Global oil demand is set to decline this year for the first time since the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, according to a report from the International Energy Agency. 
The drop, which the agency expects to amount to about 1 million barrels per day in 2026, is due to higher oil prices and disruptions to physical supply that weighed heavily, but unevenly, on various parts of the world, the report said. 
The supply disruptions were caused by the war between the U.S. and Iran , which left ships loaded with crude oil stranded in the Persian Gulf for more than three months, unable to safely travel through the Strait of Hormuz , a major route for oil and gas shipments. 
“The future of Hormuz is probably more uncertain today than it was at the beginning of the war," said Jim Burkhard, vice president and head of crude oil research at S & P Global Energy. 
Burkhard said Iran is still trying to control the strait, while the U.S. has not been able to fully restore normal operations, making a return to prewar conditions unlikely. 
Global oil demand averaged just 97.9 million barrels per day in May, down 5.3 million barrels per day from a year earlier. 
Much of the decline was in Asia, which relies heavily on oil from the Middle East. 
China’s decrease of 1.5 million barrels per day, representing a 9% decline, was by far the largest globally, the report said. 
But the main exception to the global slump in oil usage was in the U.S., where gasoline use increased in the second quarter of 2026, despite the fact that pump prices were about 50% above their prewar levels in May, the report said. 
China decided to massively cut down on purchasing oil from the global market as the price rose during the spring, reducing its consumption by almost 6 million barrels per day, Burkhard said. 
“What China said is, ‘You know what, prices are high, there’s a crisis. 
We have this huge inventory stock, we can sustain demand. 
We’re just going to cut by 50% the amount of crude oil we buy,’” Burkhard said. 
One way China cut back its consumption was to temporarily stop filling up its strategic petroleum reserve, which it had been adding to at a rate of nearly 1 million barrels per day, said Daniel Sternoff, senior fellow at the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University. 
The crisis also accelerated China's saving of road transportation fuels as its use of electric vehicles grew, he said. 
“What we’re tracking so far, at least since the crisis began, is China is probably on track to see somewhere between 500,000 and 600,000 barrels per day worth of demand losses for gasoline and diesel. 
So that’s pretty significant,” Sternoff said. 
A fragile ceasefire enabled some ships to exit through the Strait of Hormuz in June, which allowed more oil on the market. 
That led to lower oil prices. 
But even after tensions escalated between the U.S. and Iran earlier this month, prices didn't spike. 
“This gray zone conflict that the U.S. and Iran are in, it’s not really a shock to the oil market,” Burkhard said. 
“It can push prices up and down a few dollars like it did the other day, but it’s not the same shock that it was in early March when Iran did what many thought was unthinkable.” 
Another reason oil prices didn't spike very high after recent military strikes is that there were fewer buyers available to scoop up the supply that had become available, experts said. 
On top of China dramatically reducing consumption, several refineries in Russia were unable to process crude after being damaged in drone hits from Ukraine , and refineries in the Middle East remained damaged from the war, Burkhard said. 
As a result, prices for gasoline, diesel and other refined products have stayed inflated longer than oil prices, he said. 
“There’s this gush of supply of crude oil being made available to the market, and there’s simply less demand for that crude oil,” Burkhard said. 
Gasoline prices surpassed $4.50 on average for a gallon of regular in the U.S. in May, rising more than 50% since the start of the war, according to AAA data. 
But that didn't stop drivers from hitting the road; in fact, gasoline consumption rose in the U.S. during the second quarter of the year. 
One reason may be because the percentage of household income spent on gasoline in the U.S. has been declining for years, Sternoff said. 
Plus, many people have been transitioning from remote work to in-office jobs, he added. 
“Even though it’s a really political price that people pay a lot of attention to, if you are in the higher quintiles of income in the U.S., you might grumble about it, but you’re not really driving less just because of that increase in prices,” Sternoff said. 
Iran live updates: US officials say negotiations with Iran to resume 
Maine couple spots a bear chasing a moose calf and helps it escape 
Secret Service urged Trump to use old Air Force One as a security precaution: Sources 
Attorney for Mississippi teen's family recounts 'altercation' on boat 
24/7 coverage of breaking news and live events 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.8%ABC News: 1.5%ABC News: 2.2%Confirmation Bias12.8%This article: 2.4%ABC News: 0.7%ABC News: 0.7%Anchoring Bias2.4%This article: 14.7%ABC News: 2.8%ABC News: 3.0%Availability Heuristic14.7%This article: 1.7%ABC News: 0.6%ABC News: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic1.7%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.4%ABC News: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.9%ABC News: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 12.5%ABC News: 4.7%ABC News: 6.8%Framing Effect12.5%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%ABC News: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%ABC News: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.8%ABC News: 1.3%ABC News: 2.4%Optimism Bias3.8%This article: 5.6%ABC News: 1.1%ABC News: 1.0%Pessimism Bias5.6%This article: 12.5%ABC News: 6.8%ABC News: 7.7%Negativity Bias12.5%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 1.1%ABC News: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%ABC News: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%ABC News: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%ABC News: 0.3%ABC News: 0.8%In-Group Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%ABC News: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 1.3%ABC News: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.7%ABC News: 1.2%ABC News: 1.3%Recency Bias0.7%This article: 1.6%ABC News: 0.3%ABC News: 0.4%Primacy Effect1.6%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%ABC News: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 20.0%ABC News: 2.8%ABC News: 3.3%Appeal to Authority20.0%This article: 3.1%ABC News: 0.2%ABC News: 0.9%False Dilemma3.1%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.6%ABC News: 2.1%ABC News: 2.8%Hasty Generalization5.6%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.5%ABC News: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.5%ABC News: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 2.0%ABC News: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%ABC News: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 35.3%ABC News: 1.9%ABC News: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)35.3%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%ABC News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 1.7%ABC News: 0.1%ABC News: 0.2%Composition/Division1.7%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.7%ABC News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 2.6%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%No True Scotsman2.6%This article: 18.7%ABC News: 2.1%ABC News: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)18.7%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%ABC News: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.2%ABC News: 2.7%ABC News: 1.9%Unattributed Quote4.2%This article: 1.4%ABC News: 0.9%ABC News: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection1.4%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 2.2%ABC News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.7%ABC News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.4%ABC News: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%ABC News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%ABC News: 1.5%ABC News: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.9%

921 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers51%attributed speech448writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageCATHY BUSSEWITZ • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 0.0% coverageJim Burkhard • 35 words • 0.0% coverageJim Burkhard • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageJim Burkhard • 32 words • 0.0% coverageJim Burkhard • 13 words • 100.0% coverageJim Burkhard • 10 words • 100.0% coverageJim Burkhard • 16 words • 100.0% coverageDaniel Sternoff • 48 words • 0.0% coverageDaniel Sternoff • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDaniel Sternoff • 35 words • 0.0% coverageDaniel Sternoff • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJim Burkhard • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJim Burkhard • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageJim Burkhard • 38 words • 0.0% coverageJim Burkhard • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJim Burkhard • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageDaniel Sternoff • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDaniel Sternoff • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDaniel Sternoff • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Daniel Sternoff

100%flagged-word coverage
192 attributed words41% of attributed speech88% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%Daniel Sternoff: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.