Author summary
19% 2 analyzed articles/videos 404 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carole Hawke-Diop results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Anecdotal , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 169 hits . Analysis detected 886 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,528 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 10% (7,492 of 8,291 authors). This Carole Hawke-Diop is better (less manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group. Carole Hawke-Diop
Author details
Total words: 3,528
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.6% percentile 1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Composition/Division: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst