Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carol Smith results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , In-Group Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 45.5% saturation with 273 hits . Analysis detected 1,195 faulty-reasoning hits from 600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.3% and a BS Rank of 97% (211 of 6,576 authors). This Carol Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group. Carol Smith
Author details
Total words: 600
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.8% percentile 13.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles600 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 45.5% 45.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 23.3% 23.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 42.0% 42.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 19.2% 19.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.5% 7.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 7.2% 7.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 5.0% 5.0% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Author 45.5%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Author 42.0%, sitewide 26.9% In-Group Bias: Author 23.3%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.0%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Author 19.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst