Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video937 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carlos Morales results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 700 hits. Analysis detected 3,541 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,690 of 6,138 authors). This Carlos Morales is worse (more manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Carlos Morales
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
57%Carlos Morales (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,748
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

56% percentile
025507510056.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 9.9%9.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Author 9.9%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos