NPR84%

In West Texas, an unlikely alliance stands against extending the border wall 46%

By Carlos Morales0%

5/26/2026, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 37.1% saturation with 348 hits. Analysis detected 2,328 faulty-reasoning hits from 937 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.6% and a BS Rank of 46% (10,983 of 20,271 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 54.20% of the article peer group.

REDFORD, Texas  On a quiet spring morning, Joe Pineda drives across his land near the Rio Grande, pointing out where he runs cattle and grows alfalfa and the family cemetery that dates back to the late 1800s. 
As he reaches the edge of the river, the 52-year-old slows his hulking pickup truck to a crawl. 
He then talks about his family's deep history in the Big Bend area of West Texas and the days he spent here as a child and the times he brought his own children. 
"It's things like that that I'm going to miss," said Pineda as a gentle wind ran through the overgrown reeds and mesquite trees crowding the river. 
"It's the time that you can enjoy with your kids, and enjoy (the) heritage of your land, where your great-grandparents and everybody else before you lived  and it's going to be taken." 
Pineda and his family have received a letter from the federal government warning of eminent domain proceedings if they don't agree to sell the land or voluntarily give access for border wall construction. 
It's a scene playing out across the Big Bend as the government looks to build roughly 175 miles of "border barrier." 
This area, one of the last pockets of untouched frontier country, is set for 30-foot-tall steel fences, patrol roads, flood lighting and surveillance systems. 
The federal government plans have united an unusual coalition of people across the political spectrum who say a wall is not needed here. 
They worry about threats to the environment and Indigenous sites, to impact on the region's famously dark skies and on wild animals, like Black bears, bobcats and bighorn sheep. 
It's all part of a $56-million dollar tourism industry that Pineda says is now in jeopardy. 
"They're killing our economy with this wall," Pineda said, standing by the Rio Grande. 
"This area gets a lot of money from tourism. 
It's going to make everything change, it's gonna be sad." 
U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection tells NPR the agency will try to "avoid or minimize impacts to the environment to the greatest extent possible" in the areas where they plan to build walls. 
Historically, the area's rugged and unforgiving terrain has meant fewer people attempting to cross into the U.S. through this region. 
And since the beginning of President Trump's second term in office, that number has fallen even further. 
In the first three months of this year, Customs and Border Protection's Big Bend Sector  a vast and seemingly boundless area covering nearly 500 miles of the Rio Grande  saw 498 apprehensions, which is just over a tenth of the apprehensions made in Texas' busiest sector. 
"We're not the number one crossing spot," said Brewster County Sheriff Ronny Dodson, who grew up in the region and has been the county's top law enforcement officer for the last 26 years. 
In recent months, Dodson, along with four other border sheriffs, wrote federal and state officials to say a border wall in the Big Bend area isn't the "most practical or strategic approach to border security in this area." 
"We agree with border security," Dodson said in an interview. 
"We agree there needs to be walls (in) places. 
There's no ifs, ands or buts about that, but not here. 
We just need to be monitored, we need the manpower and I think we'd be very fine." 
Dodson's county, the largest by land area in the state, is home to Big Bend National Park. 
At one point the beloved destination for hikers and river enthusiasts was set for a border wall too, but CBP now says it's no longer planning to construct 30-foot-tall steel fencing. 
Instead, the agency will build vehicle barriers and patrol roads along the border in the national park, which archaeologists say will still have an impact and would dig into environmentally and culturally sensitive land. 
For Dodson, who has written his own letters to President Trump and Texas Gov. 
Greg Abbott imploring them to visit the region, the money being poured into border barriers could be better spent. 
The price tag for a single mile of border barrier in the region: over $17 million dollars. 
"These numbers are mind boggling," said Hudspeth County Judge Joanna Mackenzie. 
"That type of money is generational changing." 
In a joint-letter, Mackenzie and all of the top elected local officials on the Texas-Mexico border wrote the government, asking for a say in how border security takes shape in the places they know best. 
"Tell us is this gonna happen and we don't have a say in it. 
What can we do, what can we do?" 
Mackenzie asked. 
"That's it, what can we do?" 
Some private land owners in the Big Bend say they're willing to do whatever it takes, including filing their own lawsuits against the government, to stop the build-up at the border. 
"This fight is one we did not ask for," said Raymond Skiles, a longtime wildlife biologist in the region and a landowner himself. 
Sitting in his home in Alpine, Texas, Skiles looks at a map Customs and Border Protection sent him. 
"If this were to come to pass, it would be a rip in the treasured landscape of the Big Bend," said Skiles, holding back tears. 
"It'd be like taking a knife to the Mona Lisa, and just cutting it in two and leaving that rent scar across it." 
For Skiles, an imposing barrier through the Big Bend would be a painful reminder of what once was, an unwanted memorial to the place he calls home. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.5%Carlos Morales: 0.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Confirmation Bias3.5%This article: 6.9%Carlos Morales: 4.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.6%Anchoring Bias6.9%This article: 2.1%Carlos Morales: 1.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.8%Availability Heuristic2.1%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Carlos Morales: 0.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.4%Overconfidence Bias1.9%This article: 5.5%Carlos Morales: 7.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.1%Framing Effect5.5%This article: 19.9%Carlos Morales: 10.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Loss Aversion19.9%This article: 3.3%Carlos Morales: 2.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Status Quo Bias3.3%This article: 2.0%Carlos Morales: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect2.0%This article: 5.2%Carlos Morales: 1.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Optimism Bias5.2%This article: 8.2%Carlos Morales: 2.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Pessimism Bias8.2%This article: 28.7%Carlos Morales: 7.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.3%Negativity Bias28.7%This article: 3.9%Carlos Morales: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Self-Serving Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Carlos Morales: 1.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%In-Group Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%Carlos Morales: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.7%Recency Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 24.3%Carlos Morales: 8.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.1%Appeal to Authority24.3%This article: 1.2%Carlos Morales: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%False Dilemma1.2%This article: 3.7%Carlos Morales: 0.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Slippery Slope3.7%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.6%Carlos Morales: 3.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 4.4%Hasty Generalization10.6%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.3%Carlos Morales: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.7%Bandwagon1.3%This article: 37.1%Carlos Morales: 18.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.6%Appeal to Emotion37.1%This article: 5.0%Carlos Morales: 1.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Begging the Question5.0%This article: 3.3%Carlos Morales: 1.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.3%This article: 2.5%Carlos Morales: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Tu Quoque2.5%This article: 2.0%Carlos Morales: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.4%Burden of Proof2.0%This article: 2.6%Carlos Morales: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Appeal to Nature2.6%This article: 6.3%Carlos Morales: 1.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Composition/Division6.3%This article: 16.2%Carlos Morales: 4.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Anecdotal16.2%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 15.6%Carlos Morales: 3.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)15.6%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.1%Carlos Morales: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Middle Ground1.1%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 3.3%Carlos Morales: 0.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Special Pleading3.3%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.7%Carlos Morales: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Unattributed Quote1.7%This article: 2.9%Carlos Morales: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection2.9%This article: 6.5%Carlos Morales: 3.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.1%Biased Writer Voice6.5%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Morales: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

937 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers34%attributed speech616writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Pineda • 26 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Pineda • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageJoe Pineda • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Pineda • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Pineda • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageCustoms and Border Protection • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 0.0% coverageRonny Dodson • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageRonny Dodson • 10 words • 0.0% coverageRonny Dodson • 9 words • 0.0% coverageRonny Dodson • 11 words • 0.0% coverageRonny Dodson • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJoanna Mackenzie • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJoanna Mackenzie • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageJoanna Mackenzie • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJoanna Mackenzie • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageJoanna Mackenzie • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageRaymond Skiles • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageRaymond Skiles • 25 words • 0.0% coverageRaymond Skiles • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Joe Pineda

100%flagged-word coverage
92 attributed words29% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.9 ptsWriter: 9.9%Joe Pineda: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.4 ptsWriter: 4.4%Joe Pineda: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%Joe Pineda: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.