Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Carlos Guerrero results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 166 hits. Analysis detected 712 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,557 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,215 authors). This Carlos Guerrero is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Carlos Guerrero
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Carlos Guerrero (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,557
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.0%7.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 10.7%10.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.7%0.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos