Women amputees in South America train to be World Cup soccer contenders 28%

By Juan Karita0% Carlos Guerrero0%

7/18/2026, 12:42:32 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Indoctrination, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 411 faulty-reasoning hits from 519 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 38.8% and a BS Rank of 28% (15,381 of 21,197 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the article peer group.

From a distance, the women running sprints, taking corner kicks and dribbling past defenders on a soccer field in eastern Bolivia on Friday could easily be mistaken for players preparing for next year's FIFA Women’s World Cup. 
But the goalies are making saves with a single arm while other players are using crutches to propel themselves down the pitch. 
This is the first soccer training camp in South America for female amputees seeking to represent their countries in the 2027 Women's Amputee Football World Cup. 
Nearly three dozen women from 10 countries  including Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador and Colombia  converged on the field in Bolivia's lowland city of Santa Cruz for five days of training that concluded Friday with friendly matches. 
Most of the participants have lost limbs to infections or traumatic injuries. 
Under the rules of the amputee cup, a seven-a-side soccer tournament, all prosthetic limbs must be removed before the game kicks off. 
Players rely on crutches to run but cannot use them to touch the ball. 
Elite athletes from around the world, including from the U.S. 
Women’s National Amputee Soccer Team, helped coach the camp, which was organized by the World Amputee Football Federation, the body that governs the global tournaments, along with local authorities and nonprofits. 
“The life of amputees can sometimes be hard, but we adapt really fast,” said Amie Donathan, 21, from the U.S. team, who was born with one leg. 
“The way I feel about this camp, honestly, can't be described.” 
Women train while world watches FIFA World Cup 
The training in Bolivia, unfolding while the world remains captivated by the final week of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, covered everything from balance, coordination and movement on crutches to ball control, tactics and the rules of amputee soccer. 
Men have played international amputee soccer since the 1980s and now compete in a World Cup every four years. 
The sport has grown steadily in recent decades, particularly in places scarred by war like Gaza and Rwanda. 
But the women’s game only held its first World Cup in 2024. 
The host, Colombia, clinched the inaugural title. 
The next Amputee Women's World Cup will take place in Poland in 2027, with the specific date and city yet to be announced, the camp organizers told The Associated Press. 
“It’s so that women with amputations can realize their dream through sports, through soccer,” said Lidia Mayser, president of the sports council for the Santa Cruz region, which is working to create a national federation and assemble a team to represent Bolivia at next year's tournament. 
For Filomena Luna, the training has helped her find community and embrace a sport she never imagined she could play. 
The mother of six lost a leg at age 11 after an infection worsened when her parents initially sought treatment from a traditional healer instead of a doctor. 
Now 50, she hopes to one day represent Bolivia on the world stage. 
“This practicing and training has helped me improve tremendously," she said. 
“Soccer is an escape for me." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Juan Karita: 3.5%The Independent: 3.2%Availability Heuristic3.5%This article: 7.1%Juan Karita: 2.4%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic7.1%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Juan Karita: 3.8%The Independent: 8.2%Framing Effect3.9%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.7%Juan Karita: 1.2%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.6%Juan Karita: 10.7%The Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias11.6%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 1.2%Juan Karita: 0.4%The Independent: 12.1%Negativity Bias1.2%This article: 2.1%Juan Karita: 0.7%The Independent: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.3%Juan Karita: 0.8%The Independent: 1.5%Recency Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 2.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.0%Juan Karita: 2.0%The Independent: 3.8%Appeal to Authority6.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.3%Juan Karita: 1.9%The Independent: 4.2%Hasty Generalization2.3%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.1%Juan Karita: 7.0%The Independent: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion12.1%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.4%Juan Karita: 5.4%The Independent: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.4%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 3.5%Juan Karita: 1.2%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature3.5%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.9%Juan Karita: 1.3%The Independent: 2.2%Anecdotal3.9%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.9%Juan Karita: 0.6%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote1.9%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 7.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 8.9%Juan Karita: 3.0%The Independent: 1.3%Indoctrination8.9%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Juan Karita: 0.0%The Independent: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

519 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers25%attributed speech387writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWorld Amputee Football Federation • 31 words • 0.0% coverageAmie Donathan • 27 words • 0.0% coverageAmie Donathan • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageLidia Mayser • 46 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageFilomena Luna • 11 words • 0.0% coverageFilomena Luna • 6 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lidia Mayser

100%flagged-word coverage
46 attributed words35% of attributed speech49% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Indoctrination+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Lidia Mayser: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%Lidia Mayser: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.