Author summary
12% 1 analyzed article/video 1,121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bridge Michigan results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 253 hits . Analysis detected 1,485 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 27% (6,065 of 8,291 authors). This Bridge Michigan is better (less manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group. Bridge Michigan
Author details
Total words: 4,484
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst