Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brianna Tucker results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 385 hits. Analysis detected 2,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 89% (750 of 6,628 authors). This Brianna Tucker is worse (more manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group.
Brianna Tucker
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
89%Brianna Tucker (selected)7%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,656
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

89% percentile
025507510088.7% percentile
6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.6%16.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 11.5%11.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 8.6%8.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.0%4.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 5.2%5.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 23.3%23.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 23.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.5%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 8.6%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%No True Scotsman: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos