Author summary
17% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,938 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Allnutt results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 3.3% saturation with 344 hits . Analysis detected 3,219 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,330 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (7,977 of 8,525 authors). This Brian Allnutt is better (less manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group. Brian Allnutt
Author details
Total words: 10,330
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.4% percentile 1.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst