Author summary
⁠6%1 analyzed article/video110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bob Aube results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Recency Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 49 hits. Analysis detected 191 faulty-reasoning hits from 440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (481 of 9,042 authors). This Bob Aube is worse (more manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group.
Bob Aube
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Tabitha Mueller1%
⁠95%Bob Aube (selected)9%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 440
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

95% percentile
025507510094.7% percentile
8.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles440 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 11.1%11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.1%11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 11.1%11.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 5.7%5.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos