Author summary
8% 1 analyzed article/video 735 analyzed words
BS Summary: These B. Sakura Cannestra results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 143 hits . Analysis detected 767 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 29% (6,459 of 9,064 authors). This B. Sakura Cannestra is better (less manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. B. Sakura Cannestra
Author details
Total words: 2,940
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.7% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.9% 4.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst