Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ariel Cohen results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 389 hits . Analysis detected 3,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,419 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,378 authors). This Ariel Cohen is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Ariel Cohen
Author details
Total words: 4,419
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst