Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,919 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Antonio De Loera-Brust results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 1,432 hits . Analysis detected 9,794 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,075 of 6,358 authors). This Antonio De Loera-Brust is worse (more manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group. Antonio De Loera-Brust
Author details
Total words: 7,676
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.4% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 18.1% 18.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.3% 5.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.7% 18.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.0% 8.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.7%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 18.1%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.0%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst