Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 598 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anne-Elisabeth Moutet results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Framing Effect , and Horn Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 611 hits . Analysis detected 2,727 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,392 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,746 of 6,360 authors). This Anne-Elisabeth Moutet is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Anne-Elisabeth Moutet
Author details
Total words: 2,392
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.6% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 25.5% 25.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.6% 10.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 11.0% 11.0% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 8.1% 8.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Author 11.0%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Horn Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 1.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst