Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video725 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Martin results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 4% saturation with 116 hits. Analysis detected 602 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 1% (6,333 of 6,359 authors). This Anna Martin is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group.
Anna Martin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
1%Anna Martin (selected)1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,900
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.4% percentile
0.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos