Author summary
60%1 analyzed article/video65 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ann Duan results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, False Dilemma, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 174 faulty-reasoning hits from 260 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.2% and a BS Rank of 97% (313 of 9,095 authors). This Ann Duan is worse (more manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group.
Ann Duan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
97%Ann Duan (selected)12%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 260
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

97% percentile
025507510096.6% percentile
11.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles260 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.2%6.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 12.3%12.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 15.0%15.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 21.5%21.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 6.2%6.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 21.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Author 15.0%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Author 12.3%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos