Author summary
95% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,771 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andy Walker results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Anecdotal , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 1,012 hits . Analysis detected 6,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,313 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,924 of 6,629 authors). This Andy Walker is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group. Andy Walker
Author details
Total words: 5,313
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.9% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 19.1% 19.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 10.9% 10.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 19.1%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.6%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst