Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,091 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Fishman LCSW results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Hasty Generalization , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 458 hits . Analysis detected 3,047 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,441 of 6,365 authors). This Andrew Fishman LCSW is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group. Andrew Fishman LCSW
Author details
Total words: 4,364
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 6.1% 6.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 10.5% 10.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 10.5%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst