Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video4,806 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ali Watkins results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 1,822 hits. Analysis detected 13,275 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,224 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (5,299 of 6,529 authors). This Ali Watkins is better (less manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group.
Ali Watkins
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
19%Ali Watkins (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 19,224
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

19% percentile
025507510018.8% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles19.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.5%9.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.2%8.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.1%5.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos