Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AFP bureaus in Tehran results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Quote-first Misdirection , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 275 hits . Analysis detected 1,706 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,480 of 6,348 authors). This AFP bureaus in Tehran is worse (more manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group. AFP bureaus in Tehran
Author details
Total words: 1,500
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.7% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 6.1% 6.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 8.0%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Slippery Slope: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Middle Ground: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst