Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 864 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Rasgon results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 816 hits . Analysis detected 3,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,951 of 6,628 authors). This Adam Rasgon is worse (more manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group. Adam Rasgon
Author details
Total words: 3,456
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.5% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 23.6% 23.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 23.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst