Author summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video496 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Doc Fox results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Self-Serving Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 68.6% saturation with 1,021 hits. Analysis detected 3,168 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (695 of 6,628 authors). This Adam Doc Fox is worse (more manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group.
Adam Doc Fox
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠90%Adam Doc Fox (selected)7%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,488
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

90% percentile
025507510089.5% percentile
6.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 68.6%68.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.1%6.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 19.1%19.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.2%5.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 12.7%12.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 8.6%8.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Author 68.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 19.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.9%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.6%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Red Herring: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Composition/Division: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos