Psychedelic questions and perfect ISO: Unfiltered reality of covering Inkcarceration Day 2 88%

By Adam Doc Fox99%

7/19/2026, 5:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 69.4% saturation with 344 hits. Analysis detected 1,608 faulty-reasoning hits from 496 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 81% and a BS Rank of 88% (2,627 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 88.00% of the article peer group.

“Inkmates” prepare for the metal wonder of Gojira at Inkcarceration 2026 in Mansfield. 
MANSFIELD  What’s the real deal with “magic mushrooms?” 
Those are the types of questions you can get answered at Inkcarceration 2026. 
Me? 
Nah, I was in boring sober mode ‘cause the night before I couldn’t get the camera to work to the elite level needed. 
My boss and CEO of this news thing you are reading is like good at photos and I knew death would be upon me soon and so I spent all day upgrading my ISO knowledge. 
But I was torn on what pictures to take for this new and improved mega ultimate death metal gallery  there were so many beautiful humans at Ink; but at a festival allows you to be free of the expectations of others, especially when it comes to documentation. 
Never have I ever heard a negative comment about what someone was wearing in all my decades covering festivals. 
But it’s that shade cover that matters  the safety of the fest, free of the perv cam, the exploitation, the  wait, sorry, I just got woke-broke; here’s some photos of Sleeping With Sirens, check them out and then I’ll report back. 
All photos by Adam Doc Fox. 
Spite 
Kellin Quinn 
Sleeping With Sirens 
Nick Martin 
The real conclusion of life and thrashcore festivals is don’t be awesome if you don’t want people to both admire and have some degree of good envy for you. 
Take for example bloody-hand-wash lady. 
She covered herself in some oil-based lather of crimson for the costume, and after using the porta potty, was trying to wash her hands, but they were like, covered in fake blood. 
But she was determined to not acknowledge this factor as the red rain poured down her arms and she kept trying to clean up the mess she created and dear god don’t we all. 
This Irish-looking dude with red hair whose ancestors were conquered by Vikings gave me a mini turtle and that actually made me happy. 
Why can’t little things make us content more often? 
“Hey, look out!” 
this rabble rouser said, pointing to the ground as I walked by. 
He and his cool kid buddies laughed because turns out there was no hazard and I jumped over nothing and maybe we all do that too often. 
Shoe-less scooter Johnny about ended my pro wastoid career when he came barreling through the crowd, full throttle on the scooter’s electric gas, holding an inflatable green T-Rex. 
I guess we all need to be more aware of the plight of others. 
Here’s some pics, I dunno , the Ops team I work with is not gonna rock wit da ratio here, but they also make news breathe in a way I never could so maybe we all need a little evolution. 
Gojira and Spite gallery, all photos by Adam Doc Fox: 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.6%Adam Doc Fox: 0.9%Richland Source: 2.4%Confirmation Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.1%Adam Doc Fox: 7.9%Richland Source: 3.5%Availability Heuristic11.1%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 1.5%Richland Source: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 5.4%Adam Doc Fox: 1.8%Richland Source: 0.4%Hindsight Bias5.4%This article: 7.1%Adam Doc Fox: 4.4%Richland Source: 2.8%Overconfidence Bias7.1%This article: 13.7%Adam Doc Fox: 5.4%Richland Source: 4.3%Framing Effect13.7%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 15.1%Adam Doc Fox: 5.0%Richland Source: 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect15.1%This article: 17.7%Adam Doc Fox: 6.5%Richland Source: 6.7%Optimism Bias17.7%This article: 7.7%Adam Doc Fox: 2.6%Richland Source: 0.7%Pessimism Bias7.7%This article: 18.3%Adam Doc Fox: 6.1%Richland Source: 2.4%Negativity Bias18.3%This article: 12.7%Adam Doc Fox: 12.7%Richland Source: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias12.7%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 4.6%Richland Source: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 6.9%Adam Doc Fox: 2.3%Richland Source: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias6.9%This article: 2.8%Adam Doc Fox: 3.6%Richland Source: 1.8%In-Group Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.7%Adam Doc Fox: 6.8%Richland Source: 6.1%Halo Effect9.7%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Adam Doc Fox: 0.9%Richland Source: 0.2%Primacy Effect2.6%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Adam Doc Fox: 0.8%Richland Source: 0.0%Ad Hominem2.4%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 2.4%Richland Source: 6.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 5.8%Adam Doc Fox: 3.9%Richland Source: 0.8%False Dilemma5.8%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 21.6%Adam Doc Fox: 19.1%Richland Source: 4.4%Hasty Generalization21.6%This article: 8.7%Adam Doc Fox: 5.8%Richland Source: 0.4%Red Herring8.7%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 5.2%Richland Source: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.1%Adam Doc Fox: 2.4%Richland Source: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.1%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 9.7%Adam Doc Fox: 3.2%Richland Source: 0.2%Composition/Division9.7%This article: 22.4%Adam Doc Fox: 7.5%Richland Source: 1.2%Anecdotal22.4%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 1.5%Richland Source: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.2%Adam Doc Fox: 1.6%Richland Source: 1.1%Unattributed Quote4.2%This article: 2.4%Adam Doc Fox: 1.2%Richland Source: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection2.4%This article: 69.4%Adam Doc Fox: 68.6%Richland Source: 7.2%Biased Writer Voice69.4%This article: 11.3%Adam Doc Fox: 5.3%Richland Source: 3.4%Indoctrination11.3%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 0.0%Richland Source: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Doc Fox: 2.9%Richland Source: 1.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 25.8%Adam Doc Fox: 8.6%Richland Source: 4.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…25.8%

496 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers0.8%attributed speech492writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageKellin Quinn • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageNick Martin • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kellin Quinn

0%flagged-word coverage
2 attributed words50% of attributed speech98% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Biased Writer Voice-69.9 ptsWriter: 69.9%Kellin Quinn: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -26.0 ptsWriter: 26.0%Kellin Quinn: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-11.4 ptsWriter: 11.4%Kellin Quinn: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-4.3 ptsWriter: 4.3%Kellin Quinn: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.4 ptsWriter: 2.4%Kellin Quinn: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.