Author summary
23% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,092 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aaron Mondry results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Anecdotal , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 592 hits . Analysis detected 2,170 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,042 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 12% (7,495 of 8,474 authors). This Aaron Mondry is better (less manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group. Aaron Mondry
Author details
Total words: 6,042
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.6% percentile 1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.8% 9.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst