White Sox let five leads get away in brutal 13-inning loss to red-hot Red Sox 6%

By Jeff Agrest11%

8/6/2026, 9:47:02 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Recency Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 188 hits. Analysis detected 689 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,013 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 14.1% and a BS Rank of 6% (28,541 of 30,207 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 94.50% of the article peer group.

BOSTON  When it was finally over, the press-box announcer read the time of the game, 4 hours, 23 minutes  “like the old days.” 
He was referring to the Red Sox’ old days, particularly in their rivalry with the Yankees, before the advent of the pitch clock. 
But for the White Sox, the old days are the last three seasons, each of which ended with more than 100 losses. 
While the Red Sox refused to lose, the White Sox refused to win, blowing five leads and falling 12-11 in 13 often agonizing innings. 
The Red Sox swept the three-game series and the season series, extended their winning streak to eight and improved to 31-5 since June 25. 
“Good battle there,” White Sox manager Will Venable said. 
“Some things that we could control, you wish you had back. 
But gotta give the Red Sox credit. 
The hardest team to beat right now. 
We’ve seen it firsthand. 
The record against them speaks for itself.” 
The White Sox led 7-6 in the bottom of the ninth with newly acquired reliever Huascar Brazoban one strike from leaving the tying run on third. 
But Wilyer Abreu singled to center, and the wackiness began. 
After the White Sox scored twice in the 10th on Chase Meidroth’s second two-run homer of the game into the Monster seats, the Red Sox tied it. 
After the White Sox scored once in the 11th and 12th, the Red Sox tied it. 
And after the White Sox left a runner on third in the 13th, the outcome felt inevitable. 
Sure enough, Erick Fedde, who pitched three innings two days ago, allowed Caleb Durbin’s winning single. 
Lost in the madness was newly acquired Luis Castillo, who gave the White Sox exactly what they had hoped for in his first start  for two innings. 
After retiring the first seven batters he faced and being staked to a 4-0 lead, Castillo walked No. 8 hitter Anthony Seigler and allowed a home run to No. 
9 Connor Wong, only his third of the season. 
After the White Sox added a run in the top of the fourth, Castillo’s wheels came off in the bottom half, when he allowed two singles and two doubles that led to three runs. 
He left after four innings, allowing five runs, six hits and one walk with five strikeouts. 
“The fastball command, the walk ahead of the Wong home run,” Venable said of Castillo’s issue. 
“And then it just kind of piled up on him; couldn’t put guys away.” 
Making matters worse, the White Sox lost newly acquired catcher Joey Bart to a fractured left hand when he was hit by a pitch. 
He’ll go on the injured list. 
“It’s a tough series, no doubt about it, especially with a chance to win tonight and end things on a good note here on a tough road trip,” Venable said. 
“I think there’s a bunch of stuff that obviously we got to do a better job of.” 
Venable mixing it up 
Venable said he’s going to start using the designated-hitter spot to give Munetaka Murakami, Miguel Vargas and Colson Montgomery opportunities against left-handed pitchers. 
Part of that strategy will be tapping into Luisangel Acuna’s versatility. 
Venable gave Acuna his first start of the season in left field Thursday, forcing him to contend with the Green Monster. 
“Obviously, Fenway is unique,” Venable said before the game. 
“I thought it was actually a good spot to expose him to for the first time. 
He’ll run down some flyballs today, get a feel for it. 
And really the way you approach the wall is pretty simple. 
Everything off the wall, you just fire into second base.” 
The ball found Acuna quickly. 
Red Sox leadoff man Nick Sogard flew out to him. 
But Acuna’s stay was short. 
After the Red Sox replaced left-handed starter Ranger Suarez with righty Greg Weissert in the fourth, left-handed-hitting and regular left fielder Sam Antonacci took over. 
Venable also said he might’ve undervalued Randal Grichuk’s defense and will look to play him in left field more, as well. 
Venable largely has been platooning the right-handed-hitting Grichuk and the left-handed-hitting Andrew Benintendi at DH. 
“I just think we need to be flexible in some ways, especially for those big guys that are out there every day,” Venable said. 
“Maybe instead of an off day, we can keep their bat in the lineup.” 
Double-A Birmingham outfielder James Taussig and High-A Winston-Salem right-handed pitcher Jake Curtis were named the Sox’ minor-league player and pitcher of the month for July. 
Curtis is a native of Downstate Chatham and has known Springfield-native Antonacci since they were children. 
 Shortstop Roch Cholowsky, whom the Sox took with the first pick in the draft last month, hit his first professional home run Thursday, an opposite-field three-run shot in his third game for Winston-Salem. 
 Bulls TV voice Adam Amin, former White Sox catcher A.J. 
Pierzynski, Adam Wainwright and Ken Rosenthal will call the Sox’ game against the Guardians at 6:15 p.m. 
Saturday on Fox 32. 
Latest on the White sox 
Did Sam Antonacci give Willson Contreras a chicken wing? 
The White Sox left fielder made contact with the Red Sox first baseman on the first play of the game Wednesday  and Contreras clearly took exception. 
Nothing goes right for White Sox in shutout loss to Red Sox 
Sean Burke struggled in the ballpark of his youth, Sam Antonacci made two costly mistakes and the White Sox couldn’t dent Sonny Gray in a 4-0 loss. 
Injured White Sox catcher Kyle Teel saves Davis Martin from tipping pitches 
“I would say I’m good at picking up patterns, good at pattern recognition,” Teel, who’s on the injured list with a sprained left ankle, told the Sun-Times on Wednesday. 
White Sox GM Chris Getz succeeds, survives at 'grueling' trade deadline 
Getz had been through two trade deadlines as the Sox’ general manager, but neither compared to the one he just went through with a first-place team. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Jeff Agrest: 1.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Anchoring Bias2.3%This article: 2.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.3%Availability Heuristic2.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 1.7%Jeff Agrest: 0.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Hindsight Bias1.7%This article: 3.9%Jeff Agrest: 1.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias3.9%This article: 1.1%Jeff Agrest: 0.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.8%Framing Effect1.1%This article: 1.1%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Loss Aversion1.1%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.9%Jeff Agrest: 4.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.2%Optimism Bias5.9%This article: 2.2%Jeff Agrest: 0.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.1%Pessimism Bias2.2%This article: 18.6%Jeff Agrest: 3.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 6.4%Negativity Bias18.6%This article: 2.1%Jeff Agrest: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 1.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.6%Jeff Agrest: 1.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.3%Recency Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 1.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 1.4%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Circular Reasoning1.4%This article: 2.1%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.6%Hasty Generalization2.1%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.9%Jeff Agrest: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion0.9%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 1.6%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.6%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.4%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Middle Ground2.4%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.7%Jeff Agrest: 0.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.7%This article: 0.9%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.9%This article: 10.8%Jeff Agrest: 3.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.7%Biased Writer Voice10.8%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Agrest: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1013 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers30%attributed speech712writer words
Selected voice

Kyle Teel

100%flagged-word coverage
29 attributed words9.6% of attributed speech50% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-15.3 ptsWriter: 15.3%Kyle Teel: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.3 ptsWriter: 1.3%Kyle Teel: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.