Keyword summary
22% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wilyer Abreu results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 599 hits . Analysis detected 3,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,055 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (54,482 of 58,094 keywords). This Wilyer Abreu is better (less manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group. Wilyer Abreu
Keyword details
Total words: 11,055
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.2% percentile 1.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst