BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Representativeness Heuristic, and Availability Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 453 faulty-reasoning hits from 519 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 10.9% and a BS Rank of 4% (29,377 of 30,527 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.20% of the article peer group.

NEW YORK  Olympic gold medalists Chelsea Gray, A’ja Wilson and Jackie Young of the Las Vegas Aces will play for U.S. women’s national team next month in the World Cup, USA Basketball announced Thursday. 
Caitlin Clark, Angel Reese and Paige Bueckers will make their World Cup debuts and will try to help the U.S. win its fifth consecutive FIBA World Cup title. 
They will be joined by Breanna Stewart, Napheesa Collier, Kahleah Copper and Kelsey Plum, who competed in the 2024 Olympics. 
“It’s always good when you compete for a gold medal, it’s a big honor,” said Wilson, a four-time WNBA MVP. 
“It’s something I don’t take lightly. 
Time to go there and have some fun and also win.” 
Rhyne Howard and Aliyah Boston will also be making their World Cup debuts to round out the team. 
“I’m so excited to announce the 2026 USA Basketball Women’s National Team,” USA Basketball national team managing director Sue Bird said. 
“This is an incredibly talented group that has earned the opportunity to compete in Berlin. 
Wearing a USA jersey is a privilege, and I know these 12 players will embrace that responsibility as we go after another gold medal. 
I can’t wait to see what this team accomplishes together.” 
This is the first time that USA Basketball had a managing director choose the team. 
In the past it was a committee. 
Kara Lawson will coach the squad. 
Stewart is the third player in USA Basketball history to appear in four World Cup tournaments, joining Bird, who played in five, and Diana Taurasi, who also played in four. 
The Americans will face China, Italy and the Czech Republic in pool play at the World Cup, which will be held from Sept. 4-13 in Berlin. 
The WNBA will take a nearly three-week break in its season to accommodate the event. 
Clark, Bueckers and Reese helped the Americans win a World Cup qualifying tournament in Puerto Rico in March. 
Sabrina Ionescu has been a big part of the U.S. roster the last few years, but was left off this season's team. 
Bird said she called many of the players who didn’t make the team this time, including Ionescu. 
“I think we can all agree the hardest part, which is a problem I would never trade, is that we have so much talent,” Bird said. 
“The beauty of that is it means almost all players are wanting to be on this team, willing to be on this team. 
It is a sacrifice. 
It is a time commitment.” 
Alyssa Thomas helped the U.S. win gold at the Paris Olympics, but didn’t take part in any USA Basketball camps since. 
Minnesota rookie Olivia Miles also hadn’t taken part in any USA camps yet either. 
“Tremendous player. 
So much fun to watch,” Bird said of Miles, who is the front-runner for the WNBA Rookie of the Year. 
“It’s been amazing watching her grow in this league. 
 She’s played with USA basketball before. 
She will undoubtedly be in the mix for teams in the future.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.0%Associated Press: 2.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 2.2%Confirmation Bias5.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Associated Press: 2.6%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.8%Availability Heuristic7.3%This article: 11.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic11.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Associated Press: 1.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 5.7%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 3.9%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 20.2%Associated Press: 1.8%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 2.5%Optimism Bias20.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.4%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 7.2%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 4.9%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.4%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Associated Press: 0.8%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.5%In-Group Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 11.8%Associated Press: 1.5%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.7%Halo Effect11.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.2%Associated Press: 1.2%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.8%Recency Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.9%Associated Press: 2.4%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 3.2%Appeal to Authority2.9%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.4%Associated Press: 2.1%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 2.6%Hasty Generalization4.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.6%Associated Press: 3.7%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 3.2%Appeal to Emotion4.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.6%Associated Press: 1.4%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.3%Anecdotal5.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.9%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.2%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.4%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Associated Press: 0.3%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.3%

519 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers45%attributed speech287writer words
Selected voice

Sue Bird

95%flagged-word coverage
195 attributed words84% of attributed speech41% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +8.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Sue Bird: 8.7%8.7%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.