Keyword summary
16% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,544 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia Miles results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 880 hits . Analysis detected 4,861 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,525 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (34,790 of 37,536 keywords). This Olivia Miles is better (less manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group. Olivia Miles
Keyword details
Total words: 8,525
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.3% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst