Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 893 analyzed words
BS Summary: These DOUG FEINBERG results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.3% saturation with 118 hits . Analysis detected 749 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (6,394 of 6,628 authors). This DOUG FEINBERG is better (less manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group. DOUG FEINBERG
Author details
Total words: 3,572
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.5% percentile 1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst