Fox News88%

Ballot box upset: Democrats flip Florida legislative seat in Trump’s stomping ground 34%

By Paul Steinhauser0%

3/25/2026, 12:24:11 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 144 hits. Analysis detected 722 faulty-reasoning hits from 685 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.9% and a BS Rank of 34% (14,111 of 21,175 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 66.60% of the article peer group.

Florida Democrats on Tuesday flipped control of a long-vacant Republican-held state House seat in a Palm Beach-anchored district that includes Mar-a-Lago, President Donald Trump's home turf. 
The Associated Press reports that Democrat Emily Gregory defeated Republican Jon Maples in a special election in Florida's House District 87, in the race to fill the seat left vacant last August, when GOP state Rep. 
Mike Caruso resigned to become Palm Beach County clerk and comptroller. 
The ballot box battle was one of three special legislative elections being held in GOP-dominated Florida on Tuesday. 
And while the contests won't change the balance of power in the state legislature, where for more than a quarter-century Republicans have held majorities in both the House and Senate chambers, bragging rights were up for grabs in the president's home district. 
Maples was backed by Trump, who moved his primary permanent residence in 2019 from Trump Tower in New York City to Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida. 
He is also backed by a number of top Sunshine State Republicans. 
"There is a very important Special Election tomorrow, Tuesday, March 24th, for Florida State House District 87 in beautiful Palm Beach County  JON MAPLES HAS MY COMPLETE AND TOTAL ENDORSEMENT!" 
the president wrote in a social media post on Monday evening. 
The 43-year-old Maples, a financial planner and former Lake Clarke Shores Council member who, during his years at Palm Beach Atlantic University was an all-American athlete, made cutting taxes and government spending, reducing regulations, promoting private sector job creation and advancing school choice. 
Gregory, a 40-year-old Army spouse, owns and runs a Jupiter-based fitness center for pregnant and postpartum women. 
The first-time candidate made affordability, increasing public education, tackling rising property insurance and housing costs, and access to healthcare key parts of her campaign. 
Maples was the favorite heading into the special election, thanks to his fundraising advantage in a district that leads to the right. 
Trump carried the district by roughly 10 points in his 2024 re-election victory. 
And Caruso won re-election in the district by 19 points. 
Palm Beach County was once firmly blue until Republicans made electoral gains in recent cycles. 
The Democrats' victory is their latest win or over performance in a slew of special elections and off-year contests since Trump returned to power in the White House 14 months ago. 
Partially fueling the Democrats' ballot box performances is their laser focus on affordability amid persistent inflation. 
And the victories are further energizing Democrats as they work to win back control of the U.S. 
House and possibly the Senate in this autumn's midterm elections. 
The Democratic National Committee (DNC), in a statement Tuesday night, called Gregory's win "an earthshattering victory for Florida Democrats and humiliating defeat for Donald Trump." 
"Donald Trump’s own neighbors just sent a crystal clear message: They are furious and ready for change," DNC chair Ken Martin emphasized in a statement. 
"If Democrats can win in Trump’s own backyard, we can win anywhere. 
From now until November, Democrats are all gas and no brakes as we compete across every corner of Florida and the nation." 
The Republican National Committee (RNC), in commenting on the results, noted that special elections are not always the best barometer of things to come. 
"A low-turnout state House special election is a snapshot of local quirks, candidate dynamics, and turnout math  not some grand verdict." 
RNC Senior Adviser Danielle Alvarez said in a statement. 
In Florida's other state House special election, the AP reports that Republican Hilary Holley defeated Democrat Edwin Perez, in the race to replace GOP state Rep. 
Josie Tomkow. 
The district covers parts of Polk County, in the central part of the state. 
At the time this story posted, the state Senate special election between Tomkow and Democrat Brian Nathan was too close to call. 
Tomkow and Nathan were running to succeed Republican Jay Collins, who resigned from the seat in August to become the state's lieutenant governor. 
The district includes much of Democrat-leaning Tampa as well as the more GOP-leaning Northwest Hillsborough suburbs. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.5%Paul Steinhauser: 1.4%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 1.7%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Paul Steinhauser: 1.7%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias1.8%This article: 14.3%Paul Steinhauser: 8.9%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect14.3%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.4%Paul Steinhauser: 1.2%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias7.4%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.6%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 6.1%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 10.4%Paul Steinhauser: 1.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias10.4%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.3%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 1.7%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.5%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 2.2%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 2.9%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.5%Paul Steinhauser: 3.2%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority4.5%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.9%Paul Steinhauser: 3.7%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization9.9%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.5%Paul Steinhauser: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon2.5%This article: 15.0%Paul Steinhauser: 5.5%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion15.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.3%Paul Steinhauser: 2.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.3%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.6%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 11.7%Paul Steinhauser: 2.4%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice11.7%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 21.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias21.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 1.8%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

685 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers24%attributed speech524writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDemocratic National Committee (DNC) • 25 words • 0.0% coverageKen Martin • 25 words • 0.0% coverageKen Martin • 12 words • 0.0% coverageKen Martin • 22 words • 0.0% coverageRepublican National Committee (RNC) • 24 words • 0.0% coverageDanielle Alvarez • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ken Martin

100%flagged-word coverage
59 attributed words37% of attributed speech31% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Politically Left Leaning B-27.5 ptsWriter: 27.5%Ken Martin: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-15.3 ptsWriter: 15.3%Ken Martin: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.