Out-of-control Canadian wildfires prompt calls for ‘Nuremberg trials for big oil’ 61%

By Olivia Rosane92%

7/17/2026, 2:13:09 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 264 hits. Analysis detected 1,970 faulty-reasoning hits from 890 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.2% and a BS Rank of 61% (10,403 of 26,228 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 60.30% of the article peer group.

A swimmer checks out the view of the smoke from Northern Ontario forest fires that has the City of Toronto skyline shrouded in haze as viewed from Humber Park West in Toronto. 
July 15, 2026. 
Steve Russell/Toronto Star via Getty Images 
This story originally appeared in Common Dreams on July 16, 2026 . 
It is shared here under a Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) license. 
As wildfires raged across Canada on Thursday, sending dangerous smoke across the border into major US cities, climate advocates called for accountability for the fossil fuel industry , which knew for decades that its products were largely responsible for the climate crisis , yet chose to push climate denial instead. 
While fire is a natural part of the lifecycle of Canada’s boreal forests, the heating of the atmosphere due to the burning of oil , gas, and coal has made fires more frequent and extreme. 
“We need Nuremberg trials for Big Oil ,” the youth-led Sunrise Movement wrote on social media in response to the fires. 
We need Nuremberg trials for Big Oil. https://t.co/nHhbDXB06X 
- Sunrise Movement 🌅 (@sunrisemvmt) July 16, 2026 
Climate Defiance agreed, posting , “Nuremberg-style trials are in order for the fossil fuel executives who knew what they were doing to our children’s futures and did anyway.” 
There were 884 fires burning in Canada on Thursday, with 124 out of control, according to the country’s national wildland fire summary. 
Over 100 fires were raging in Ontario alone, where they have forced the evacuation of at least 15 rural communities; destroyed homes in the Indigenous community of Collins First Nation, or Namaygoosisagagun; and polluted the skies over parts of the upper Midwest and Northeastern US. 
As of Thursday evening Eastern time, the four cities with the worst air quality in the world were Chicago, Detroit, New York, and Toronto , according to IQAir. 
People have shared dramatic footage of the fires on social media. 
One video shows a train moving through a blaze near Armstrong, Ontario. 
Thankfully, all crew members were evacuated safely, The Guardian reported . 
This is near Armstrong, Ontario. 
When will the Canadian National Railway Company make a statement about this incident? 
pic.twitter.com/6bKJYugeR0 
- Sol Mamakwa (@solmamakwa) July 14, 2026 
Indigenous photographer Nadya Kwandibens shared images of flames rising over a lake with the words, “”My family hometown, Collins Ontario, is GONE.“ 
View this post on Instagram 
Residents of the community fled the blaze in boats before the flames damaged and destroyed several homes and other structures, according to CBC News. 
“Collins has burned to the ground. 
This is a tragedy and we are grateful that everyone got out safely,” Lise Vaugeois, the provincial representative for the region, said, as The Guardian reported. 
“Fires are part of a natural cycle, but the extreme temperatures we are experiencing across the county and the growing severity of weather events are indicators of climate change.” 
Laura Chasmer, a professor of geography and the environment at the University of Western Ontario, noted that fires in Canada like the ones raging across Ontario have increased since 2015. 
“This is associated with some of the extreme climate warming that we’ve been seeing, and the atmospheric drying of the surface,” she told BBC News. 
Brandi Morin, a Cree-Iroquois-French journalist from Treaty 6 territory in Alberta , noted in her Substack that Canada was warming at twice the global average. 
Despite this, the Canadian government has made progress on three major fossil fuel pipelines this July. 
“Every barrel these new pipelines are built to move adds to the exact warming that’s turning our boreal forests into tinder,” Morin wrote. 
On the other side of the border, Michigan regulators late Wednesday approved important permits from the controversial Enbridge Line 5 pipeline. 
Political leaders and climate advocates responded to the fires and smoke with calls to abandon fossil fuel projects, transition to renewable energy , and hold oil and gas companies accountable for the harms they have caused. 
“We have the technology and the policy roadmap to replace fossil fuels with green energy extremely rapidly. 
The only thing stopping us is a handful of billionaires getting rich while our world burns,” the Sunrise Movement said . 
We have the technology and the policy roadmap to replace fossil fuels with green energy extremely rapidly. 
The only thing stopping us is a handful of billionaires getting rich while our world burns. https://t.co/6oqGxoC8m3 
As smoke drifted over Boston on Wednesday, Sen. 
Ed Markey (D-Mass.) wrote on social media: “Look outside in Massachusetts right now. 
The climate crisis is here. 
Wildfire smoke is suffocating our communities and our children are breathing dirty air. 
We need a Green New Deal .” 
Look outside in Massachusetts right now. 
The climate crisis is here. 
Wildfire smoke is suffocating our communities and our children are breathing dirty air. 
We need a Green New Deal. https://t.co/pXo5XOOt0q 
- Ed Markey (@EdMarkey) July 15, 2026 
“Climate change isn’t a tragedy, it’s a crime. 
The fossil fuel industry are arsonists at a global scale. 
It’s their pollution that’s fueling these horrific wildfires,” Jamie Henn, the director of Fossil Free Media, told Common Dreams. 
“Instead of approving new pipelines, the Canadian government should be holding the industry accountable and using their record profits to help communities on the frontlines of this crisis.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 25.3%Olivia Rosane: 5.6%Mondoweiss: 1.1%Confirmation Bias25.3%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.8%Mondoweiss: 0.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 19.3%Olivia Rosane: 7.1%Mondoweiss: 0.8%Availability Heuristic19.3%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.0%Mondoweiss: 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.0%Mondoweiss: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Olivia Rosane: 2.0%Mondoweiss: 0.5%Overconfidence Bias3.8%This article: 6.1%Olivia Rosane: 6.8%Mondoweiss: 1.9%Framing Effect6.1%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 2.0%Mondoweiss: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.8%Olivia Rosane: 0.8%Mondoweiss: 0.1%Status Quo Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.0%Mondoweiss: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.0%Olivia Rosane: 2.3%Mondoweiss: 0.9%Optimism Bias8.0%This article: 5.6%Olivia Rosane: 2.3%Mondoweiss: 0.6%Pessimism Bias5.6%This article: 21.5%Olivia Rosane: 8.9%Mondoweiss: 3.0%Negativity Bias21.5%This article: 2.4%Olivia Rosane: 1.7%Mondoweiss: 0.3%Self-Serving Bias2.4%This article: 9.2%Olivia Rosane: 5.5%Mondoweiss: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error9.2%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.0%Mondoweiss: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 3.1%Mondoweiss: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.0%Mondoweiss: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.4%Mondoweiss: 0.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.0%Mondoweiss: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.0%Mondoweiss: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.1%Olivia Rosane: 1.1%Mondoweiss: 0.2%Recency Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.7%Mondoweiss: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.0%Mondoweiss: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Olivia Rosane: 3.5%Mondoweiss: 0.4%Ad Hominem1.1%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.5%Mondoweiss: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.2%Olivia Rosane: 2.8%Mondoweiss: 1.2%Appeal to Authority6.2%This article: 9.6%Olivia Rosane: 3.8%Mondoweiss: 0.9%False Dilemma9.6%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 1.3%Mondoweiss: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.0%Mondoweiss: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 2.5%Mondoweiss: 2.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.0%Mondoweiss: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.0%Olivia Rosane: 1.8%Mondoweiss: 0.1%Bandwagon4.0%This article: 29.7%Olivia Rosane: 29.3%Mondoweiss: 3.2%Appeal to Emotion29.7%This article: 6.7%Olivia Rosane: 1.7%Mondoweiss: 0.4%Begging the Question6.7%This article: 10.3%Olivia Rosane: 5.9%Mondoweiss: 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.3%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.0%Mondoweiss: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.6%Olivia Rosane: 0.7%Mondoweiss: 0.5%Burden of Proof4.6%This article: 3.9%Olivia Rosane: 0.6%Mondoweiss: 0.1%Appeal to Nature3.9%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.0%Mondoweiss: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.1%Olivia Rosane: 1.1%Mondoweiss: 1.3%Anecdotal5.1%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.0%Mondoweiss: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.6%Mondoweiss: 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.0%Mondoweiss: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.0%Mondoweiss: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.0%Mondoweiss: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.0%Mondoweiss: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 0.3%Mondoweiss: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.5%Olivia Rosane: 1.6%Mondoweiss: 0.6%Unattributed Quote2.5%This article: 1.5%Olivia Rosane: 2.3%Mondoweiss: 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection1.5%This article: 1.2%Olivia Rosane: 3.1%Mondoweiss: 1.0%Biased Writer Voice1.2%This article: 11.8%Olivia Rosane: 6.5%Mondoweiss: 1.2%Indoctrination11.8%This article: 14.9%Olivia Rosane: 13.4%Mondoweiss: 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias14.9%This article: 0.0%Olivia Rosane: 1.3%Mondoweiss: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Olivia Rosane: 0.4%Mondoweiss: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.1%

890 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers48%attributed speech464writer words
Selected voice

Nadya Kwandibens

100%flagged-word coverage
22 attributed words5.2% of attributed speech69% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Nadya Kwandibens: 100.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning B-18.5 ptsWriter: 18.5%Nadya Kwandibens: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.8 ptsWriter: 2.8%Nadya Kwandibens: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.4 ptsWriter: 2.4%Nadya Kwandibens: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.