Keyword summary
84% 1 analyzed article/video 890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuremberg Trials results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 814 hits . Analysis detected 4,137 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 79% (11,563 of 53,533 keywords). This Nuremberg Trials is worse (more manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group. Nuremberg Trials
Keyword details
Total words: 3,560
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.4% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 22.9% 22.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst