KQED61%

Humidity at PG&E Substation Likely Cause of Massive December San Francisco Blackout 80%

By Katie DeBenedetti69%

5/9/2026, 12:19:38 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 116 hits. Analysis detected 761 faulty-reasoning hits from 651 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 71.7% and a BS Rank of 80% (4,393 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 79.90% of the article peer group.

The fire at a PG&E substation that sparked a major outage in December, cutting power for about a third of city residents during the holiday weekend, was likely caused by a buildup of humidity, among other factors, according to an independent report released Friday. 
The 70-page analysis by engineering consulting firm Exponent found that the South of Market substation was prone to elevated humidity and moisture, which appears to have caused damage to critical equipment that could have prevented the blaze. 
This was worsened by sudden temperature swings, like the weather that preceded the December fire. 
“The most likely failure mechanism is degradation of surface insulation of the Incident Insulating Board, likely assisted by moisture and surface contamination,” the report reads. 
The report said the fire appears to have been caused by a buildup of condensation on a piece of equipment called a “barrier insulating board,” which is supposed to act as a protective barrier against moisture, air infiltration and fire. 
The report said that a month before the fire, PG&E had observed “burned spots” and “warping” on the board, as well as metal erosion of a circuit breaker  a piece of equipment meant to halt the flow of electricity when a circuit becomes overloaded, preventing electrical fires. 
That circuit breaker failed a November test, and was replaced and reported as suspected “water damage,” though the Exponent report concluded that that damage was likely due to other causes related to the insulating board. 
Exponent also said a heater in the room where the fire broke out  which can help mitigate humidity  was likely turned off. 
The Mission Street building is ventilated with unconditioned outside air, and its system lacks heating, cooling and humidity control  meaning its interior is highly affected by changes in the outside temperature. 
City Attorney David Chiu speaks during a press conference at City Hall in San Francisco on Aug. 
15, 2024. 
(Beth LaBerge/KQED) 
City Attorney David Chiu slammed the utility company over the report Friday, saying PG&E had knowledge of equipment damage prior to the fire, and “chose to do nothing about it.” 
He said the company has a pattern of failing to invest in aging infrastructure and fixing faulty equipment. 
“San Franciscans paid the price for PG&E’s pattern of inaction and indifference during the December blackout,” Chiu said in a statement. 
“This report makes clear that meaningful improvements are essential to protect San Franciscans from future failures.” 
The report comes as San Francisco renews efforts to transition away from the public utility, in favor of a city-controlled power grid. 
The December incident sparked backlash from city leaders, who probed PG&E leaders about the outage, among other incidents, earlier this year. 
Separately, a number of small businesses and residents are suing PG&E over its response to the blackout. 
PG&E spokesperson Lynsey Paulo said in a statement that the company had made $3 billion in capital upgrades in San Francisco over the last 20 years, and “continually invest[s] in the electric system with a focus on safety and reliability.” 
“While this most recent outage was not the best reflection of our investment, that $3 billion has overall helped San Francisco to have one of the most reliable electric grids among California cities over the past decade,” she wrote. 
“We recognize that despite these substantial investments, there is still more to be done  and we are committed to delivering for San Francisco.” 
After the fire, PG&E said, it completed thousands of inspections across its 31 substations in the city, and accelerated testing and maintenance work  including replacing circuit breakers and other electrical equipment. 
It also installed humidity and temperature monitors, and is “weatherproofing” its indoor substations. 
Paulo said PG&E also added space heaters and dehumidifiers to the Mission Street substation, and is in the process of installing those at other locations. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.5%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.5%CalMatters: 1.9%Confirmation Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.5%CalMatters: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.4%Katie DeBenedetti: 3.6%CalMatters: 3.0%Availability Heuristic10.4%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.1%CalMatters: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias3.8%This article: 5.2%Katie DeBenedetti: 8.9%CalMatters: 6.3%Framing Effect5.2%This article: 3.2%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.0%CalMatters: 1.0%Loss Aversion3.2%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect4.9%This article: 7.5%Katie DeBenedetti: 4.0%CalMatters: 3.5%Optimism Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.6%CalMatters: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 17.8%Katie DeBenedetti: 8.9%CalMatters: 6.4%Negativity Bias17.8%This article: 6.1%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.6%CalMatters: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias6.1%This article: 4.6%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error4.6%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.1%CalMatters: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.8%CalMatters: 2.7%Halo Effect6.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.5%CalMatters: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.3%CalMatters: 0.6%Ad Hominem4.6%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.7%Katie DeBenedetti: 3.5%CalMatters: 3.1%Appeal to Authority5.7%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.3%CalMatters: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.1%CalMatters: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.8%Katie DeBenedetti: 3.7%CalMatters: 3.6%Hasty Generalization8.8%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.2%Katie DeBenedetti: 9.1%CalMatters: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion3.2%This article: 2.5%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.0%CalMatters: 0.6%Begging the Question2.5%This article: 12.1%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.2%CalMatters: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.1%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.8%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.5%CalMatters: 3.1%Anecdotal2.8%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.5%CalMatters: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.0%CalMatters: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 2.6%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.7%CalMatters: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice2.6%This article: 2.5%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.1%CalMatters: 1.9%Indoctrination2.5%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.6%CalMatters: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

651 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers36%attributed speech419writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Chiu • 17 words • 100.0% coverageDavid Chiu • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Chiu • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Chiu • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Chiu • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Chiu • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageLynsey Paulo • 40 words • 0.0% coverageLynsey Paulo • 39 words • 0.0% coverageLynsey Paulo • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageLynsey Paulo • 25 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

David Chiu

98%flagged-word coverage
104 attributed words45% of attributed speech75% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice+16.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%David Chiu: 16.3%16.3%Indoctrination+15.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%David Chiu: 15.4%15.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.