Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 651 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Substation Fire results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 293 hits . Analysis detected 1,795 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,953 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (14,527 of 37,536 keywords). This Substation Fire is worse (more manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group. Substation Fire
Keyword details
Total words: 1,953
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.3% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst