Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,173 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Francisco Blackout results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 702 hits . Analysis detected 4,553 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,489 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 66% (13,084 of 37,536 keywords). This San Francisco Blackout is worse (more manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group. San Francisco Blackout
Keyword details
Total words: 3,489
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.1% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 15.5% 15.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Red Herring: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst