Mediaite82%

Iran War Has Drained ‘Virtually All’ Long-Range Missiles in U.S. Stockpile: Report 60%

By Kathianne Boniello88%

8/4/2026, 5:00:16 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 45.4% saturation with 182 hits. Analysis detected 944 faulty-reasoning hits from 401 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 49.1% and a BS Rank of 60% (11,110 of 27,323 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the article peer group.

The United States has drained  virtually all  of its stockpile of precision, surface-to-surface missiles in the nearly six-month conflict in Iran, sources told Reuters. 
It’s unknown precisely how many Army Tactical Missile Systems and Precision Strike Missiles the American military has left, according to the sources . 
The munitions, known respectively as ATACMS and PrSM, are a key part of the United States’ military might  giving the ability to conduct accurate strikes from a safe distance, Reuters reported, citing three sources who spoke on the condition of anonymity. 
The weapons cost more than $1 million each and are thought to be a key part of the military’s readiness. 
ATACMS and PrSMs supplied by the U.S. have already played a crucial role in Ukraine’s war against Russia, enabling Ukraine to hit targets inside Russia’s borders. 
A fourth source said U.S. 
Central Command in the Middle East has been able to restock from U.S. supplies stored elsewhere in the world, a claim the White House has denied. 
The United States has “far more munitions than anyone in the world” and “far more than we need,” the White House told Reuters via a statement from President Donald Trump . 
“Our defense companies are, at this moment, making more munitions than they have ever made before, ​in addition to expanding their plants and equipment at record levels,” he said, according to the statement. 
ATACMs and PrSMs maker Lockheed Martin did not immediately respond to Reuters’ request for comment, while a Pentagon spokesperson also told the outlet there was nothing to fear. 
“America’s military is the most powerful in the world and has everything it needs to execute at the time and place of the President’s choosing,” spokesman Sean Parnell told Reuters. 
“We have executed multiple successful operations across combatant commands while ensuring the U.S. military possesses ​a deep arsenal of capabilities to protect our people and our interests.” 
The United States and Israel launched joint airstrikes against Iran on Feb. 
28. 
It’s not the first time word has spread of military or logistical issues with the war. 
On Saturday, the Washington Post reported a top U.S. general in Europe warned the Pentagon he didn’t have the resources to protect Israel . 
The post Iran War Has Drained ‘Virtually All’ Long-Range Missiles in U.S. 
Stockpile: Report first appeared on Mediaite . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.2%Kathianne Boniello: 4.5%Mediaite: 4.4%Confirmation Bias13.2%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.4%Mediaite: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Kathianne Boniello: 4.9%Mediaite: 3.3%Availability Heuristic6.5%This article: 10.5%Kathianne Boniello: 1.8%Mediaite: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic10.5%This article: 4.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.6%Mediaite: 0.7%Hindsight Bias4.0%This article: 13.2%Kathianne Boniello: 2.1%Mediaite: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias13.2%This article: 2.5%Kathianne Boniello: 9.6%Mediaite: 8.1%Framing Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.8%Mediaite: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.7%Kathianne Boniello: 1.8%Mediaite: 1.2%Optimism Bias7.7%This article: 7.5%Kathianne Boniello: 2.6%Mediaite: 1.4%Pessimism Bias7.5%This article: 15.0%Kathianne Boniello: 18.7%Mediaite: 13.5%Negativity Bias15.0%This article: 23.4%Kathianne Boniello: 2.9%Mediaite: 1.9%Self-Serving Bias23.4%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.7%Mediaite: 1.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.6%Mediaite: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 3.2%Mediaite: 1.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.4%Mediaite: 1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.4%Mediaite: 1.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.8%Mediaite: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.8%Mediaite: 2.1%Recency Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.3%Mediaite: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 5.7%Kathianne Boniello: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 7.3%Mediaite: 3.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 2.1%Mediaite: 0.9%Straw Man0.0%This article: 45.4%Kathianne Boniello: 4.3%Mediaite: 3.2%Appeal to Authority45.4%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 2.8%Mediaite: 2.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.0%Mediaite: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.4%Mediaite: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 15.7%Kathianne Boniello: 8.9%Mediaite: 6.6%Hasty Generalization15.7%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.2%Mediaite: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.6%Mediaite: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.0%Kathianne Boniello: 8.0%Mediaite: 5.9%Appeal to Emotion5.0%This article: 7.7%Kathianne Boniello: 1.5%Mediaite: 1.4%Begging the Question7.7%This article: 5.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.7%Mediaite: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.5%Kathianne Boniello: 1.5%Mediaite: 1.2%Burden of Proof6.5%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.2%Mediaite: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.6%Mediaite: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.0%Kathianne Boniello: 5.1%Mediaite: 2.6%Anecdotal4.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.0%Kathianne Boniello: 3.4%Mediaite: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 14.2%Kathianne Boniello: 3.3%Mediaite: 3.0%Unattributed Quote14.2%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 3.1%Mediaite: 2.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 9.1%Mediaite: 7.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 7.7%Kathianne Boniello: 3.6%Mediaite: 1.5%Indoctrination7.7%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 2.0%Mediaite: 1.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 2.2%Mediaite: 1.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.2%Mediaite: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

401 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers30%attributed speech280writer words
100%flagged-word coverage
64 attributed words53% of attributed speech76% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Indoctrination+48.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%President Donald Trump: 48.4%48.4%Unattributed Quote+39.2 ptsWriter: 9.3%President Donald Trump: 48.4%48.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.