Ken Griffin vows to 'double down' on Miami move, says NYC 'doesn't welcome success' ⁠74%

By Lindsay Kornick⁠0%

5/6/2026, 11:00:44 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Straw Man, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 119 hits. Analysis detected 732 faulty-reasoning hits from 498 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 66.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (5,739 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the article peer group.

Billionaire and Citadel CEO Ken Griffin repeated his company's intentions to "double down" on moving to Miami in the wake of his feud with New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani. 
"When we moved from Chicago, there was a debate between New York and Miami," Griffin said at the 2026 Milken Institute Conference on Tuesday. 
"It's unquestionably true that we made the right choice. 
I'll leave it at that." 
Griffin was responding to Mamdani's viral Tax Day video, which singled out Griffin's Manhattan penthouse while announcing a new pied-à-terre tax. 
MAMDANI TAX BREAK PROPOSAL SPARKS FEARS AS BUSINESS LEADERS WARN OF ‘FRAGILE’ NYC ECONOMY 
He referred to the video as "creepy and weird" and urged his New York business partners to continue to invest in freer cities like Miami. 
"Now what the mayor of New York has made clear to my partners, and principally my New York partners, is that we need to double down on our bet in Miami because we want to be in a state that embraces business, embraces education, embraces personal freedom and liberty," he said. 
"And that embraces people having an opportunity to live the American dream, a dream of earned success, not a dream of distributive handouts that leave people dependent on government for their lives and their livelihoods in a way that takes away their dignity and honor." 
"We've seen a mass exodus of business leadership from California to Texas and Florida. 
Mamdani's making it very clear. 
New York doesn't welcome success," Griffin added. 
TAX FIGHT HEATS UP AS NEW YORK TARGETS WEALTHY HOMEOWNERS 
A statement to Fox News Digital read, "Mayor Mamdani wants all New Yorkers to succeed. 
That includes business owners and entrepreneurs who create good-paying jobs and make this city the economic engine of America. 
It also includes Ken Griffin, who is a major employer in our City and a powerful figure in our economy." 
The statement continued, "That does not negate the fact, however, that our tax system is fundamentally broken. 
It rewards extreme wealth while working people are pushed to the brink. 
The status quo is unsustainable and unjust. 
If we want this city to become a place that working people can afford, we need meaningful tax reform that includes the wealthiest New Yorkers contributing their fair share." 
O’LEARY SLAMS NYC TAX PLAN AS ‘SHEER BLIND STUPIDITY,’ DEFENDS WEALTHY INVESTORS 
Despite calling out Griffin in his video, Mamdani personally thanked Griffin for his donation to the New York Police Department last week. 
"I want to thank everyone who is here with us in the Hall of Heroes today, with special thanks to Police Commissioner [Jessica] Tisch and NYPD leadership," Mamdani said at One Police Plaza, speaking before department brass and families of slain officers. 
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE 
"I also want to thank Ken Griffin for funding a memorial wall that will open later this year," he added. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 3.5%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.6%FoxBusiness: 3.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Lindsay Kornick: 2.3%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Availability Heuristic2.8%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Lindsay Kornick: 4.2%FoxBusiness: 3.7%Overconfidence Bias1.8%This article: 2.0%Lindsay Kornick: 12.6%FoxBusiness: 12.9%Framing Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 1.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.6%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 4.9%FoxBusiness: 8.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Lindsay Kornick: 1.6%FoxBusiness: 2.0%Pessimism Bias2.8%This article: 7.6%Lindsay Kornick: 15.7%FoxBusiness: 7.9%Negativity Bias7.6%This article: 9.0%Lindsay Kornick: 5.1%FoxBusiness: 4.5%Self-Serving Bias9.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 2.9%FoxBusiness: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Lindsay Kornick: 6.5%FoxBusiness: 1.7%In-Group Bias5.0%This article: 10.2%Lindsay Kornick: 2.0%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias10.2%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 4.3%FoxBusiness: 3.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 2.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Lindsay Kornick: 4.4%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Ad Hominem7.4%This article: 10.2%Lindsay Kornick: 1.9%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Straw Man10.2%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 1.8%FoxBusiness: 7.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 9.0%Lindsay Kornick: 2.6%FoxBusiness: 1.6%False Dilemma9.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.2%Lindsay Kornick: 9.0%FoxBusiness: 6.3%Hasty Generalization4.2%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 13.9%Lindsay Kornick: 10.7%FoxBusiness: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion13.9%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 2.4%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 5.0%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 2.2%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 2.1%FoxBusiness: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 1.8%FoxBusiness: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lindsay Kornick: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 23.9%Lindsay Kornick: 1.6%FoxBusiness: 1.8%Unattributed Quote23.9%This article: 5.2%Lindsay Kornick: 4.2%FoxBusiness: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection5.2%This article: 7.2%Lindsay Kornick: 3.0%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice7.2%This article: 5.8%Lindsay Kornick: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 1.7%Indoctrination5.8%This article: 9.6%Lindsay Kornick: 1.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias9.6%This article: 7.2%Lindsay Kornick: 6.3%FoxBusiness: 2.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias7.2%This article: 1.8%Lindsay Kornick: 1.6%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.8%

498 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers45%attributed speech276writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageKen Griffin • 24 words • 0.0% coverageKen Griffin • 9 words • 0.0% coverageKen Griffin • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageKen Griffin • 51 words • 0.0% coverageKen Griffin • 45 words • 0.0% coverageKen Griffin • 14 words • 0.0% coverageKen Griffin • 5 words • 0.0% coverageKen Griffin • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 20 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ken Griffin

79%flagged-word coverage
160 attributed words72% of attributed speech74% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Unattributed Quote-43.1 ptsWriter: 43.1%Ken Griffin: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-17.4 ptsWriter: 17.4%Ken Griffin: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-13.0 ptsWriter: 13.0%Ken Griffin: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -13.0 ptsWriter: 13.0%Ken Griffin: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-10.5 ptsWriter: 10.5%Ken Griffin: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-9.4 ptsWriter: 9.4%Ken Griffin: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.3 ptsWriter: 3.3%Ken Griffin: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.