BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 438 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,055 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 29.6% and a BS Rank of 13% (17,951 of 20,452 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 87.80% of the article peer group.

It’s costing more and more to gas up the hot rods that Donnie Beson has spent a lifetime tinkering with. 
He’s not questioning his support for President Donald Trump, but he feels as though the war in Iran has distracted the Republican president from the issues that got him elected. 
“Come on, Trump. 
Worry about us,” said Beson, 68, of Woodland Park, Colorado. 
“We’re in a billion-dollar-a-day war. 
It’s like, ‘Man, you forgot about the other stuff, and you got to take care of that first.’” 
Trump still has deep support among Republicans, but a new poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research indicates that the president risks frustrating his voters during a midterm election year if the United States gets involved in the kind of prolonged war in the Middle East that he promised to avoid. 
Although 63% of Republicans back airstrikes against Iranian military targets, the survey found, only 20% back deploying American ground troops. 
Rising gas prices could also pose a problem for Trump. 
The cost of oil and gas has soared since the Iran war began nearly four weeks ago, adding more financial pressure when many Americans are already worried about affording essentials. 
About 6 in 10 Republicans say they’re at least “somewhat” concerned about being able to afford gas in the next few months, according to the poll, though they’re less worried than the rest of the country. 
<h2>Trust in Trump remains high among Republicans</h2> 
About three-quarters of Republicans approve of Trump’s handling of the presidency, and a similar 70% approve of how he’s handling Iran. 
Those ratings are in line with Republicans’ support for Trump’s foreign policy generally and his approach to Cuba, where he’s recently ratcheted up pressure to change the island’s leadership. 
Many Republicans continue to have “a great deal” or “quite a bit” of trust in the president to make the right decisions on foreign issues. 
About half place a high level of trust in him when it comes to the use of military force outside the U.S. 
Roughly the same percentage of Republicans have a high level of trust on his dealings with adversaries and allies. 
This partially redacted image from video provided by U.S. 
Central Command shows a military aircraft in Iran shortly before it was struck by a missile fired by U.S. forces on Sunday, March 1, 2026. 
(U.S. 
Central Command via AP) 
Sharon Fuller, 68, is a firm backer of the president and approves of his handling of the job, as well as the war in Iran. 
A retired hospital analyst from Ocklawaha, Florida, Fuller expressed some reservations about the war but called Trump a “huge patriot” and said she’s been impressed with how the stock market has done since he became president again. 
“I don’t really agree with the war, but on the other hand, I think it’s a necessity at this point,” she said. 
Republicans stand out from Americans overall in their support for the war. 
A recent Quinnipiac University poll found that about 8 in 10 registered voters who are Republicans think the war with Iran will make the world “safer,” compared with about one-third of voters overall. 
<h2>Further entanglement in Iran could frustrate Trump’s supporters</h2> 
The vast majority of Republicans in the AP-NORC poll, 81%, say it’s “extremely” or “very” important for the U.S. to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, lending support to one of the goals that Trump has articulated since the war began. 
But only about half of Republicans see replacing Iran’s government with leaders who are more friendly to the U.S. as a high priority. 
Stephen Hauss, 40, is a state Agriculture Department employee in Camden, Delaware, where he manages environmental programs. 
Hauss described his political views as libertarian-leaning, and he voted for Trump in 2024. 
But the start of the Iran war has changed his views about the president. 
“Before the war I was just kind of like, ‘OK, like, I voted for him. 
I got to give him, like, some benefit of the doubt,’” he said. 
Now, Hauss said he can’t support the U.S. trying to change the leadership of another country. 
He added, “I don’t think I am on board with this anymore.” 
President Donald Trump speaks at the National Republican Congressional Committee’s (NRCC) annual fundraising dinner, Wednesday, March 25, 2026, at Union Station in Washington. 
(AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson) 
Other efforts to get the U.S. more involved in Iran could complicate matters further for Trump. 
Only about 2 in 10 Republicans favor deploying U.S. ground troops to fight Iran, while about one-third don’t have an opinion and about half are opposed. 
Thomas Sweeney, 76, is a retired chemical engineer from Frisco, Texas, who voted for Trump three times. 
An Army officer veteran, Sweeney said he can’t get behind the war, which has brought down his overall view of the president. 
“I’m not happy. 
I am frustrated,” he said. 
“Soldiers are very, very precious. 
You just don’t go in there and waste lives.” 
<h2>Gas prices causing unease among some in GOP</h2> 
The rising cost of oil and gas is another vulnerability for Trump, even within his own party. 
About three-quarters of Republicans say it’s “extremely” or “very” important for U.S. foreign policy to keep gas prices down, which could increasingly be at odds with their support for the war. 
About 3 in 10 Republican registered voters in the Quinnipiac University poll say the price of gasoline has been a “very” or “somewhat” serious problem for their family lately. 
If high gas prices linger, they could create even more frustration for Trump supporters who hoped the president would bring down the cost of everyday goods. 
Fuller, the Florida Republican, said there’s no chance she’d vote for Democrats, but she had a message for Trump. 
“I’d like him to see what he can do to get prices down for, quote, the working people and myself now living on a fixed income,” she said. 
___ 
The AP-NORC poll of 1,150 adults was conducted March 19-23 using a sample drawn from NORC’s probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. 
The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points and for Republicans is plus or minus 6.7 percentage points. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.2%Mike Catalini: 2.9%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias1.2%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.4%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 1.3%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.7%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 2.9%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Mike Catalini: 6.3%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect7.7%This article: 3.5%Mike Catalini: 0.5%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion3.5%This article: 2.1%Mike Catalini: 0.3%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.1%Mike Catalini: 1.0%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias3.1%This article: 2.5%Mike Catalini: 1.2%AP News: 2.0%Pessimism Bias2.5%This article: 4.1%Mike Catalini: 4.6%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 1.0%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.9%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Mike Catalini: 1.8%AP News: 1.2%In-Group Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.7%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Mike Catalini: 1.7%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect3.5%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.7%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.8%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 1.1%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 1.9%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 1.4%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.7%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 2.6%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.1%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 1.9%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.3%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.3%Mike Catalini: 1.5%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.3%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.1%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.5%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.4%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.3%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 1.6%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.3%Mike Catalini: 0.9%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.3%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 4.1%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.4%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.2%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.7%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mike Catalini: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1055 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers14%attributed speech907writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDonnie Beson • 3 words • 100.0% coverageDonnie Beson • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDonnie Beson • 5 words • 0.0% coverageDonnie Beson • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 54 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageSharon Fuller • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageStephen Hauss • 15 words • 0.0% coverageStephen Hauss • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageStephen Hauss • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Sweeney • 3 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Sweeney • 5 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Sweeney • 5 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Sweeney • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageSharon Fuller • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sharon Fuller

100%flagged-word coverage
50 attributed words34% of attributed speech40% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.