NYPD body-cam video shows cop shoot knife-wielding man charging at him in East Harlem 31%

By Nicholas Williams58%

4/25/2026, 4:45:27 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.1% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 657 faulty-reasoning hits from 441 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.4% and a BS Rank of 31% (15,225 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the article peer group.

The NYPD released police body-camera footage of an officer firing a single shot at a man wielding a 13-inch knife who charged at him after clashing with workers earlier this month at an East Harlem grocery store. 
Footage of the incident shows Carlos Santiago, 53, being shot once in the abdomen by NYPD Officer Maxwell Bindman after Santiago refused orders to drop his blade and instead ran straight toward him on April 6 around 1:38 a.m. 
“Drop the knife!” 
Bindman ordered Santiago four times before firing the shot. 
Santiago, who was hysterical on the ground after being struck, was rushed to Harlem Hospital where he underwent surgery and was in critical but stable condition. 
“The officers gave multiple verbal commands to drop the knife and attempted to create physical distance between himself and the subject,” NYPD Inspector Andrew Natiw said at a police briefing after the incident. 
“But the subject quickly advanced toward the officers with the knife extended out.” 
When the suspect “got in close proximity to the officers,” one of them fired, Natiw said, striking the suspect. 
About 20 minutes before the shooting, around 1:15 a.m., Santiago got into an argument with workers inside the City Fresh Market grocery store on Third Ave. near E. 120th St. 
Santiago was then removed from the store by store security after refusing to leave. 
But he returned about 20 minutes later, standing outside the store while waving the knife and threatening store workers for several minutes. 
Workers locked the door and called 911. 
“Following the dispute, the male suddenly became irate and disorderly and had to be physically removed from the store by multiple employees,” Natiw said. 
“A short time later, the subject returned to the store. 
When he returned he had a large kitchen knife in his hand and was banging on the exterior glass of the window with the knife.” 
Bindman and another officer who arrived on scene were taken to a hospital for observation but were not hurt. 
Santiago was charged with menacing a police officer and criminal possession of a weapon. 
Bail was set for Santiago at $5,000 cash and $10,000 bond at his Manhattan Criminal Court arraignment on April 9. 
He’s due back in court on May 13. 
Natiw said it wasn’t yet clear if the suspect has mental health issues or what his argument with store workers was about. 
The suspect has been arrested six times in the past on charges including criminal possession of a controlled substance, burglary, felony assault, criminal contempt and criminal sale of a controlled substance, police said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.0%Nicholas Williams: 2.4%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Confirmation Bias15.0%This article: 12.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Anchoring Bias12.0%This article: 11.6%Nicholas Williams: 3.1%newyorkdailynews: 3.4%Availability Heuristic11.6%This article: 7.5%Nicholas Williams: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic7.5%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 1.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 16.6%Nicholas Williams: 5.0%newyorkdailynews: 6.1%Framing Effect16.6%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 28.1%Nicholas Williams: 8.1%newyorkdailynews: 9.8%Negativity Bias28.1%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 1.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Nicholas Williams: 1.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error4.3%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Nicholas Williams: 6.2%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Halo Effect4.3%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Nicholas Williams: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Primacy Effect6.8%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.5%Nicholas Williams: 2.8%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Appeal to Authority7.5%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.5%Nicholas Williams: 2.7%newyorkdailynews: 4.1%Hasty Generalization7.5%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.7%Nicholas Williams: 6.6%newyorkdailynews: 7.4%Appeal to Emotion0.7%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 2.0%newyorkdailynews: 3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 3.4%newyorkdailynews: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.7%Nicholas Williams: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.7%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.3%Nicholas Williams: 2.3%newyorkdailynews: 2.1%Unattributed Quote4.3%This article: 0.7%Nicholas Williams: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.7%This article: 14.5%Nicholas Williams: 4.1%newyorkdailynews: 6.7%Biased Writer Voice14.5%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

441 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers37%attributed speech278writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageMaxwell Bindman • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageAndrew Natiw • 33 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Natiw • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Natiw • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Natiw • 24 words • 100.0% coverageAndrew Natiw • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Natiw • 22 words • 0.0% coveragepolice • 33 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

police

100%flagged-word coverage
33 attributed words20% of attributed speech87% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-14.4 ptsWriter: 14.4%police: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.1 ptsWriter: 1.1%police: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.