Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video525 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zoning Reform results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 263 hits. Analysis detected 1,511 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (9,006 of 16,562 topics). This Zoning Reform is better (less manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
Zoning Reform
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,100
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.6% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.5%12.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Middle Ground: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos